|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical block request on [email protected] (was Re: ISPs who de-aggregate intentionally?)
this is an abuse of anonymous addresses and an abuse on this list. since the person being mocked didn't even reply to this thread, there is certainly NO need for this twit to reply. List Admin, please drop this person. zero content here. even the spam thread floods have more content than [email protected] thank you On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 04:50:37PM -0700, [email protected] wrote: > > > > As part of the process of making the latest BGP draft an IETF > > standard, the IDR working group is in the process of reviewing how > > the current draft reflects deployed code. > > > > As part of this effort, if anyone is aware of ISPs who intentionally > > de-aggregate routes and could contact me to share some of the > > reasoning and their methodologies behind this, I would greatly > > appreciate it. > > It's great for traffic engineering. We have two different upstreams in > two different cirites, and use it to avoid traffic on our core. We > wanted to offer static IP dialups for roaming users, but had troubles > with /32 prefixes being filtered by the big players. > > -Dalph > > > > > Get your free encrypted email at https://www.hushmail.com
|