North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: classless delegation [Re: IP address fee??]
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 11:04:36PM +0200, Brad Knowles wrote: [snip] > > 60.1.0.10.in-addr.arpa. CNAME bla-reverse.example.org. > > bla-reverse.example.org. PTR bla.example.org. > > bla.example.org. A 10.0.1.60 > > > > What's wrong with that? No RFC against it ;) > > Are you sure about that? IIRC, the definitions of CNAME records > and what they can point to are pretty strict. If that is illegal, then so is RFC2317 :) > > Cool, why does it work then? <grin> > > Just because something hasn't actually been made officially > illegal doesn't mean that it's not a really bad idea. It seems to me RFC2317 is pushing the edge of standards more than my solution is. Greetz, Peter -- [email protected] | http://www.dataloss.nl/ | Undernet:#clue
|