North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: AT&T NYC
On Tue, 3 Sep 2002, Jesper Skriver wrote: > > Links and loopbacks => IGP > Why on earth does you want your link addresses in your IGP ? > Sometimes it cannot be avoided, due to bad implementation, but why do > you need it ? Routers that learn a route over IBGP need to know where the next hop address for route from other AS points to. Since this can't be a loopback address and you typically don't run an IGP on subnets between border routers in your AS and a remote AS, you need to either set next-hop-self on all IBGP sessions or redistribute connected in your IGP. Iljitsch van Beijnum
|