|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical RE: AT&T NYC
Yup. I like using OSPF to set up the mesh to the loopbacks and then ibgp as the IGP. On Thu, 29 Aug 2002, Michael Hallgren wrote: > >Um. Set up more than one reflector.... > > yes... and align your setup with your physical topology(so making it > useful); > use other proto for mapping your infra, etc, etc,.. > > mh > > On Thu, 29 Aug 2002, Ralph Doncaster wrote: > > > > > On Thu, 29 Aug 2002, Peter van Dijk wrote: > > > > > On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 01:09:54PM -0400, [email protected] wrote: > > > > > Has anybody mentioned the benefits of ISIS as an IGP to them. > > > > Link-state protocols are evil, and when they break, they *really* > break. > > > > I still do not see a compeling argument for not using BGP as your IGP. > > > > > > Slow convergence. > > > > As well there is the issues of running a full iBGP mesh. I've actually > > been doing it, and now that I'm about o add my 5th router, OSPF is > > looking a lot better than configuring 4 more BGP sessions. I've heard > > some people recommend a route-reflector, but that would mean if the > > route-reflector goes down you're screwed. > > > > -Ralph > > > > > > > > > > > >
|