|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: mail delivery time on nanog-l (was Re: Die thread, DIE!)
On Wed, 21 Aug 2002, Chris Adams wrote: > Well, on the thread in question, my response took 15 minutes to get back > to me (well, 15:06 to be precise). That is by far the largest RTT for a > list that I've posted to lately (not counting lists with servers down, > etc.). > Here are two examples. I have seen email with 20+ minutes delay even on the last hop to me, though in the first example it was only 4-5 minutes. In the first example most of the delay is within merit, on the last one the majority of the delay is from trapdoor to my box. Return-Path: <[email protected]> Received: from trapdoor.merit.edu (trapdoor.merit.edu [198.108.1.26]) by uplift.swm.pp.se (8.11.6/8.9.3) with ESMTP id g7LLDkM25219 for <[email protected]>; Wed, 21 Aug 2002 23:13:46 +0200 Received: by trapdoor.merit.edu (Postfix) id 1EDD29138D; Wed, 21 Aug 2002 17:10:18 -0400 (EDT) Delivered-To: [email protected] Received: by trapdoor.merit.edu (Postfix, from userid 56) id 3A048913BB; Wed, 21 Aug 2002 17:09:25 -0400 (EDT) Delivered-To: [email protected] Received: from segue.merit.edu (segue.merit.edu [198.108.1.41]) by trapdoor.merit.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D91191313 for <[email protected]>; Wed, 21 Aug 2002 16:50:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: by segue.merit.edu (Postfix) id 3D8E65DDAF; Wed, 21 Aug 2002 16:50:00 -0400 (EDT) Delivered-To: [email protected] Received: from mx0.inoc.net (mx0.inoc.net [64.246.130.30]) by segue.merit.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 120745DD9F for <[email protected]>; Wed, 21 Aug 2002 16:50:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: from nimbus (unverified [10.0.0.111]) by mx0.inoc.net (Vircom SMTPRS 5.3.232) with ESMTP id <[email protected]>; Wed, 21 Aug 2002 16:49:59 -0400 Another example: Return-Path: <[email protected]> Received: from trapdoor.merit.edu (trapdoor.merit.edu [198.108.1.26]) by uplift.swm.pp.se (8.11.6/8.9.3) with ESMTP id g7LL0AM24539 for <[email protected]>; Wed, 21 Aug 2002 23:00:11 +0200 Received: by trapdoor.merit.edu (Postfix) id 1440191379; Wed, 21 Aug 2002 16:37:29 -0400 (EDT) Delivered-To: [email protected] Received: by trapdoor.merit.edu (Postfix, from userid 56) id 6EB0991384; Wed, 21 Aug 2002 16:32:55 -0400 (EDT) Delivered-To: [email protected] Received: from segue.merit.edu (segue.merit.edu [198.108.1.41]) by trapdoor.merit.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC01891378 for <[email protected]>; Wed, 21 Aug 2002 16:31:04 -0400 (EDT) Received: by segue.merit.edu (Postfix) id AB8455DDAF; Wed, 21 Aug 2002 16:31:04 -0400 (EDT) Delivered-To: [email protected] Received: from lerlaptop.iadfw.net (lerlaptop.iadfw.net [206.66.13.21]) by segue.merit.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D19A5DD9F for <[email protected]>; Wed, 21 Aug 2002 16:31:04 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lerlaptop.iadfw.net (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g7LKV0dQ003881; Wed, 21 Aug 2002 15:31:00 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from [email protected]) -- Mikael Abrahamsson email: [email protected]
|