North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical RE: Eat this RIAA (or, the war has begun?) - Why not all ISPs?
On Wed, 21 Aug 2002, Nigel Clarke wrote: > > Start now, do whatever it takes. > > Amongst the paperwork passed to congress, RIAA must have indicated where > it's hackers would work from. Why not start there? > > NANOG should not sit on this. > > Trust me, if RIAA tried to function without email and internet access for a > day or two I think they would get the message. Surprisingly enough, they didn't seem to care too much that their website was offline fora few days. You never can tell though. > > <Nigel> > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Richard A Steenbergen [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2002 6:30 PM > To: Nigel Clarke > Cc: Jerry Eyers; [email protected] > Subject: Re: Eat this RIAA (or, the war has begun?) - Why not all ISPs? > > > On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 09:08:03PM -0700, Nigel Clarke wrote: > > > > Why don't larger ISPs follow through on this? Simply deny RIAA any > > access... > > And what IPs precisely are you planning to deny? So far its all idle > threats, we have no idea where they plan to launch their scans or hacking > attempts from, or even if they have any clue how to hack anything. I > highly doubt they'll be attaching riaa.com to it either. > > I suppose if you want symbolism, you can host -l riaa.com and wack their > wcom webserver and other stuff at att, but I'd harly call that > productive. > > -- > Richard A Steenbergen <[email protected]> http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras > PGP Key ID: 0x138EA177 (67 29 D7 BC E8 18 3E DA B2 46 B3 D8 14 36 FE B6) >
|