|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical RE: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org
Yo Robert! How about moving this discussion to a more appropriate list? Nanog is not the place to discuss spam and we are re-inventing the wheel, badly, on nanog. Half the spam I get is from throw away AOL, netzero, earthlink, etc. accounts. Spend $10 for a new ISP account, sent 10,000 emails with MY return address which is valid and on whitelists. Do it on a long weekend and get 30k out before you get stopped. If the spammers can not run their own name servers then they will just use someone elses. Last I checked there where over 6,000 ISPs in the country. Cancel them one place and they just go to another. RGDS GARY --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Gary E. Miller Rellim 20340 Empire Blvd, Suite E-3, Bend, OR 97701 [email protected] Tel:+1(541)382-8588 Fax: +1(541)382-8676 On Wed, 21 Aug 2002, Robert Blayzor wrote: > Treat them sort of like SSL certs now. Charge an annual registrar fee > per company, not per server. (Something like $100 a year) The more they > have to go out of their way to get their spam server online, the more > they would be deterred to do so. They're only going to want to change > so many ISP's, go through SWIP and then change their legal name for the > registrar so many times.
|