Re: Microslosh vision of the future

• From: Stephen Sprunk
• Date: Mon Aug 12 09:58:02 2002

Thus spake "Alif The Terrible" <[email protected]>
> On Sun, 11 Aug 2002, gg wrote:
> >
> > Guess my home P.C. will no longer be an intel platform......hello mighty
SPARC
>
> I guess you didn't actually read this, did you?  It makes no difference what
> you use at home, if that machine can't talk to the rest of the world.

1. There will be CPU vendors that won't require Palladium-signed code
2. There will be OSes that won't require Palladium-signed code
3. There will be applications that won't require Palladium-signed code
4. There will be IETF protocols that won't require Palladium-signed code
5. The Net will not require Palladium-signed code

and most importantly:

6. This article is completely incorrect on how Palladium will work.

S

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Microslosh vision of the future Alif The Terrible
  • Re: Microslosh vision of the future Gerardo A. Gregory

• References:
  • Re: Microslosh vision of the future Alif The Terrible

• Prev by Date: Re: endpoint liveness (RE: Do ATM-based Exchange Points make sense an ymore?)
• Next by Date: Re: Do ATM-based Exchange Points make sense anymore?
• Date Index
• Thread Index
• Author Index
• Historical