North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: OC-768 availability?
Not necessarily. Don't forget that exchangecolo is in Hunters Point:) so its not totally unusual for people to put their networks in the hood. :) On Tue, 30 Jul 2002, David Charlap wrote: > > I think an OC-192 network using 56K modems in the core would be a pretty > obvious giveaway as well. > > -- David > > Rowland, Alan D wrote: > > Compton, CA, US and Sealand would be the giveaways. > > > > Scott Weeks wrote: > >> > >> No, he's not for real. It's a satire in the likes of Bandy Rush and such. > >> Children need to have their fun... > >> > >>> [email protected] wrote: > >>> > >>> I am currently running a network of cisco 2621s with the OC-192 NM for my > >>> upstream connections. The internal network links are a mixture of K56Flex > >>> modems and GRE tunnels. > >>> > >>> I am looking to upgrade to OC-768 real soon now and am wondering what the > >>> prospects are for OC-768 availability on the 2621 platform. I've found the > >>> 2621 to be rock-solid, except when I ping it, so I'd like to keep my network > >>> on that platform if possible. > >>> > >>> In addition, if anyone knows the availability of OC-768 circuits between the > >>> following cities I'd appreciate any fiber maps and an approximate price > >>> range: > >>> Ottawa, ON, CA > >>> Midland, ON, CA > >>> Goderich, ON, CA > >>> Toronto, ON, CA > >>> Compton, CA, US > >>> Sealand > >>> > >>> At each site I plan to announce a /24 from a /20 I was allocated so if > >>> everyone could please update their prefix filters now that would be great. > >>> > >>> Thank you. > >>> > >>> -- Dalph Roncaster >
|