North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: solving problems instead of beating heads on walls

  • From: Andy Dills
  • Date: Sat Jul 27 17:21:47 2002

On Sat, 27 Jul 2002, Brad Knowles wrote:

> >  Responsible and overall best: connect to the same 2+ providers in both
> >  locations and announce more specifics locally in each region/city/whatever
> >  with no-export.
>
> 	As said above, this isn't possible.  I'd like to learn what could
> be done in this kind of situation that would allow the desired
> redundancy, while also being responsible.
>
> 	I'm not a manager of a large network (where I might have this
> kind of problem myself), nor am I employed at a large ISP (where my
> customers might have this kind of problem).  But I would like to
> learn.

It depends on the quality of intra-AS connectivity.

In situations such as Ralph's, where intra-AS connectivity is strong, it
has been shown that there is a technique to allow for the weaker transit
link to be only used for backup: conditional BGP announcements and a gre
tunnel over the transit links in both cities.

Andy

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Andy Dills                              301-682-9972
Xecunet, LLC                            www.xecu.net
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Dialup * Webhosting * E-Commerce * High-Speed Access