|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: PSINet/Cogent Latency
You certainly would, except for the fact that the provider is in bankruptcy and won't/can't answer the phone. We wanted to do an oc3 or oc12 or gig-e, but that was replied to with, "wha?" On Mon, 22 Jul 2002, Brian wrote: > bwahaha, 2 funnee. I gotta think most people would be thinking of adding > another ds3 at that point. > > Bri > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Phil Rosenthal" <[email protected]> > To: "'Alex Rubenstein'" <[email protected]> > Cc: <[email protected]> > Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 6:05 PM > Subject: RE: PSINet/Cogent Latency > > > > > > 40mb/s isn't "loaded" for a DS3? > > > > --Phil > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > > Alex Rubenstein > > Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 8:27 PM > > To: Derek Samford > > Cc: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: PSINet/Cogent Latency > > > > > > > > > > Yes, it's horrid. I've been peering with PSI for going on three years, > > and it's never been as bad as it is now. > > > > oddly enough, we see 30+ msec across a DS3 to them, which isn't that > > loaded (35 to 40 mb/s). > > > > Then, behind whatever we peer with, we see over 400 msec, with 50% loss, > > during business hours. > > > > > > > > On Mon, 22 Jul 2002, Derek Samford wrote: > > > > > > > > There was some mail being tossed around earlier about Cogent > > having > > > latency. I'm actually seeing this on PSINet (Now owned by > > > Cogent.) Is anyone else still seeing the latency they were > > > experiencing earlier? > > > > > > Derek > > > > > > > -- Alex Rubenstein, AR97, K2AHR, [email protected], latency, Al Reuben -- > > -- Net Access Corporation, 800-NET-ME-36, http://www.nac.net -- > > > > > > > -- Alex Rubenstein, AR97, K2AHR, [email protected], latency, Al Reuben -- -- Net Access Corporation, 800-NET-ME-36, http://www.nac.net --
|