North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: PSINet/Cogent Latency

  • From: Brian
  • Date: Mon Jul 22 21:43:06 2002

bwahaha, 2 funnee.  I gotta think most people would be thinking of adding
another ds3 at that point.

    Bri

----- Original Message -----
From: "Phil Rosenthal" <[email protected]>
To: "'Alex Rubenstein'" <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 6:05 PM
Subject: RE: PSINet/Cogent Latency


>
> 40mb/s isn't "loaded" for a DS3?
>
> --Phil
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
> Alex Rubenstein
> Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 8:27 PM
> To: Derek Samford
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: PSINet/Cogent Latency
>
>
>
>
> Yes, it's horrid. I've been peering with PSI for going on three years,
> and it's never been as bad as it is now.
>
> oddly enough, we see 30+ msec across a DS3 to them, which isn't that
> loaded (35 to 40 mb/s).
>
> Then, behind whatever we peer with, we see over 400 msec, with 50% loss,
> during business hours.
>
>
>
> On Mon, 22 Jul 2002, Derek Samford wrote:
>
> >
> > There was some mail being tossed around earlier about Cogent
> having
> > latency. I'm actually seeing this on PSINet (Now owned by
> > Cogent.) Is anyone else still seeing the latency they were
> > experiencing earlier?
> >
> > Derek
> >
>
> -- Alex Rubenstein, AR97, K2AHR, [email protected], latency, Al Reuben --
> --    Net Access Corporation, 800-NET-ME-36, http://www.nac.net   --
>
>
>