North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

RE: Internet vulnerabilities

  • From: Stephen J. Wilcox
  • Date: Fri Jul 05 08:39:24 2002 
Doesnt announcing the same routing prefix into BGP from multiple locations do
the same thing without needing a new range or enhancement in IGMP etc ?

We do this in IGP currently..

Steve





On Fri, 5 Jul 2002, Barry Raveendran Greene wrote:

> 
> 
> FYI - for those scratching their heads on "anycast" .....
> 
> I just pushed out a paper on anycast by Chris Metz. Good foundation
> material.
> 
> http://www.cisco.com/public/cons/isp/essentials/ip-anycast-cmetz-03.pdf
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of
> > Bill Woodcock
> > Sent: Friday, July 05, 2002 4:56 AM
> > To: Marshall Eubanks
> > Cc: [email protected]
> > Subject: Re: Internet vulnerabilities
> >
> >
> >
> >     > But the only IPv4 anycast
> >     > that I know of does use MSDP :
> >     >
> > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-mboned-anycast-rp-08.txt
> >     > Is there a different proposal ? What's the RFC / I-D name ?
> >
> > You seem to be confusing anycast with something complicated.  It's not a
> > protocol, it's a method of assigning and routing addresses.
> >
> >                                 -Bill
> >
> >
> >
> 
>