North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: AS path fugliness?

  • From: Mike Lewinski
  • Date: Wed Jul 03 12:14:42 2002

Of course it would be towards the end of the table.

Here's a sample of the more detailed log at http://www.rockynet.com/wtf.html

*>i205.139.72.0     a.b.c.d                 101      0 3561 23037
{1239,1785,2379,4323,4513,4546,4969,5006,5676,5778,6181,6253,6347,6395,6453,
6580,6993,7132,7795,10242,10346,10492,10625,10674,10726,10851,10910,10937,10
957,11101,11134,11169,11589,11657,11853,12094,12156,12163,12175,12221,13350,
13371,13443,13488,13568,13576,13578,13641,13790,13815,13882,14021,14130,1428
9,14359,14381,14452,14549,14564,14677,14685,14929,14990,15062,15150,15214,15
215,16477,16504,16554,16597,16631,16640,16707,16782,16852,16980,17033,17060,
17253,17304,18480,18548,18565,18618,18862,18866,18903,18957,19019,19024,1954
1,19746,19893,20045,20303,20316,20357,20458,21536,21591,21715,21822,21853,22
191,22219,22242,22299,22319,22389,22406,22476,22728,22764,22912,22960,23195,
23269,23306,23365,25639,25707,25905,26004} ?

* i                 a.b.c.d                 101      0 3561 23037
{1239,1785,2379,4323,4513,4546,4969,5006,5676,5778,6181,6253,6347,6395,6453,
6580,6993,7132,7795,10242,10346,10492,10625,10674,10726,10851,10910,10937,10
957,11101,11134,11169,11589,11657,11853,12094,12156,12163,12175,12221,13350,
13371,13443,13488,13568,13576,13578,13641,13790,13815,13882,14021,14130,1428
9,14359,14381,14452,14549,14564,14677,14685,14929,14990,15062,15150,15214,15
215,16477,16504,16554,16597,16631,16640,16707,16782,16852,16980,17033,17060,
17253,17304,18480,18548,18565,18618,18862,18866,18903,18957,19019,19024,1954
1,19746,19893,20045,20303,20316,20357,20458,21536,21591,21715,21822,21853,22
191,22219,22242,22299,22319,22389,22406,22476,22728,22764,22912,22960,23195,
23269,23306,23365,25639,25707,25905,26004} ?


*                   e.f.g.h                 25      0 701 3561 23037
{1239,1785,2379,4323,4513,4546,4969,5006,5676,5778,6181,6253,6347,6395,6453,
6580,6993,7132,7795,10242,10346,10492,10625,10674,10726,10851,10910,10937,10
957,11101,11134,11169,11589,11657,11853,12094,12156,12163,12175,12221,13350,
13371,13443,13488,13568,13576,13578,13641,13790,13815,13882,14021,14130,1428
9,14359,14381,14452,14549,14564,14677,14685,14929,14990,15062,15150,15214,15
215,16477,16504,16554,16597,16631,16640,16707,16782,16852,16980,17033,17060,
17253,17304,18480,18548,18565,18618,18862,18866,18903,18957,19019,19024,1954
1,19746,19893,20045,20303,20316,20357,20458,21536,21591,21715,21822,21853,22
191,22219,22242,22299,22319,22389,22406,22476,22728,22764,22912,22960,23195,
23269,23306,23365,25639,25707,25905,26004} ?


neighbor ids's are munged, otherwise it's a straight dump of what we're
getting. I've gotten two other confirmations as well.

Mike


----- Original Message -----
From: "Mike Lewinski" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 9:46 AM
Subject: AS path fugliness?


>
> Anyone else receiving huge as-path (more than 125) causing these:
>
> Jul  3 08:23:06 MDT: %BGP-3-INSUFCHUNKS: Insufficient chunk pools for
> aspath, requested size 268
> Jul  3 08:23:46 MDT: %BGP-3-INSUFCHUNKS: Insufficient chunk pools for
> aspath, requested size 270
> Jul  3 08:27:45 MDT: %BGP-3-INSUFCHUNKS: Insufficient chunk pools for
> aspath, requested size 274
> Jul  3 08:31:59 MDT: %BGP-3-INSUFCHUNKS: Insufficient chunk pools for
> aspath, requested size 268
> Jul  3 08:41:02 MDT: %BGP-3-INSUFCHUNKS: Insufficient chunk pools for
> aspath, requested size 268
> Jul  3 08:41:43 MDT: %BGP-3-INSUFCHUNKS: Insufficient chunk pools for
> aspath, requested size 270
> Jul  3 08:57:56 MDT: %BGP-3-INSUFCHUNKS: Insufficient chunk pools for
> aspath, requested size 268
> Jul  3 09:04:04 MDT: %BGP-3-INSUFCHUNKS: Insufficient chunk pools for
> aspath, requested size 268
> Jul  3 09:10:01 MDT: %BGP-3-INSUFCHUNKS: Insufficient chunk pools for
> aspath, requested size 268
> Jul  3 09:10:52 MDT: %BGP-3-INSUFCHUNKS: Insufficient chunk pools for
> aspath, requested size 270
> Jul  3 09:17:40 MDT: %BGP-3-INSUFCHUNKS: Insufficient chunk pools for
> aspath, requested size 268
>
> (per http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/459/35.shtml )
>
> It started just after local Qwest routes apparently recovered from some
kind
> of nose-dive. We're still sorting through the tables trying to find out
who,
> thus far longest I've found is about 20.
>
> Mike
>
>
>