North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

RE: Sprint peering policy

  • From: alex
  • Date: Wed Jun 26 16:37:40 2002

> Alex,
> 
> *I* can't make any claims, since that would be making a forward-looking
> statement, y'know...  and after today's WorldCom "events", I can hardly
> say that trusting analysts is a good thing, but if you take the time to do
> some research on ALGX, you'll probably see things like: consistency in
> meeting Wall St. expectations, a stong management team (after all, they
> *did* build MFS), and a conservative balance sheet.  We're talking about
> some experienced, reputable good ol' boys who know enough only acquire
> profitable businesses for pennies on the dollar, and only build from
> success-based capital.  If you take a good, hard look at the company as a
> whole, you'll see a company that has yet to deviate from its original
> plan, regardless of economic climate, and will tell you is still on target
> for profitability. These are all things I've learned from my own due
> dilligence via research on the web, and I'm sure you'll find the same.

I know. It is going to be a localy company to add to WCOM, MFNXQ, ADELA, Q
and others like that for exact reasons that you have listed.

Cheers,
Alex