North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

RE: Sprint peering policy

  • From: Mitchell, Dan
  • Date: Wed Jun 26 14:59:52 2002 
RE: Majdi -- I just wanted to thoroughly address Alex's question.

Besides, Allegiance *has* to make it, because I certainly can't go get a job
at WCom anymore, can I? :-)

dem


-----Original Message-----
From: Majdi S. Abbas [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 2:48 PM
To: Mitchell, Dan
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Sprint peering policy


On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 02:34:42PM -0400, Mitchell, Dan wrote:
> a strong management team (after all, they *did* build MFS)

	^
	`- I think you have mistaken this for an endorsement.

	And in the age of cooked books, stated revenue can be
misleading, particularly when it looks too good to be true.
I would be very wary of anyone in this business right now,
particularly a CLEC.

	Regardless, I don't think shameless corporate plugs
really belong on NANOG, but I'll allow that perhaps I am in
the minority.

	--msa