|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical RE: Bandwidth Monitoring by IP
I do this and it only holds limited data before rolling over so it works fine providing you sample regular and dont have -too- many macs -- Stephen J. Wilcox IP Services Manager, Opal Telecom http://www.opaltelecom.co.uk/ Tel: 0161 222 2000 Fax: 0161 222 2008 On Thu, 20 Jun 2002, Daniska Tomas wrote: > > you will get the accounting cache exhausted soon if you don't poll&clean it frequently... > > -- > > Tomas Daniska > systems engineer > Tronet Computer Networks > Plynarenska 5, 829 75 Bratislava, Slovakia > tel: +421 2 58224111, fax: +421 2 58224199 > > A transistor protected by a fast-acting fuse will protect the fuse by blowing first. > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Jared Mauch [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: 20. j�na 2002 17:17 > > To: Mitchell, Dan > > Cc: '[email protected]' > > Subject: Re: Bandwidth Monitoring by IP > > > > > > > > interface (gig|fast)ethernet1/0 > > ip account mac (in|out) > > > > On Thu, Jun 20, 2002 at 08:48:34AM -0400, Mitchell, Dan wrote: > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > Does anyone know of a low-cost solution for monitoring > > bandwidth by IP? My > > > original thought was 1 switch port = 1 IP, but in the case > > of virtual IP's > > > on a single port, that just wouldn't work. I'm seeing more > > and more of a > > > demand for a basic BW report by IP, so our customers can > > bill their customer > > > accordingly. > > > > > > Any recommendations? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Dan > > > > > > Dan Mitchell > > > Internet Systems Engineer - Boston > > > AllegianceInternet / Hosting.com > > > 781.478.1857 Direct Line > > > [email protected] > > > > -- > > Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from [email protected] > > clue++; | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/ My statements > > are only mine. > > >
|