North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: IP renumbering timeframe
On Thu, 30 May 2002 17:52:55 -0700 "Tony Hain" <[email protected]> wrote: > Marshall Eubanks wrote: > > Since I run a small AS : > > > > I like this idea. > > > > Since I believe in living dangerously : > > > > I also think that a /64 should be reserved in the IPv6 address space, > > A /64 would have no use in the proposed scheme since it identifies a > single subnet. I suspect you really want a /32 set aside since that > would provide routable space to allocate /48's to each 16 bit AS. > OK > > and (32 bit) ASN's should be given their own /32 in a GLOP > > like fashion > > for IPv6. > > I don't think the concept scales to 32 bit AS. Why not ? /32 with 32 bit ASN still leaves a /64 for each ASN. Marshall > > Tony > > > > > Leo Bicknell wrote: > > > > > In a message written on Thu, May 30, 2002 at 11:27:49AM > > -0400, Richard A Steenbergen wrote: > > > > > >>I'd be mildly concerned that people would see "free IP > > blocks" and start > > >>using them even when not necessary. I think allocating them > > a /24 from > > >>this block only when they have demonstrated need, and don't > > have any other > > >>ARIN assigned blocks, would be far more efficient. > > >> > > > > > > Since the goal is to reduce paperwork, I'm not sure about > > 'demonstrated > > > need', but I could definately endorse "you get a /24 with > > your ASN if > > > and only if you have no other registry assigned space > > assigned to you". > > > I specifically exclude provider allocated space, as I'm > > assuming the ASN > > > goal is to multihome. > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Regards > > Marshall Eubanks > > > > > > > > T.M. Eubanks > > Multicast Technologies, Inc > > 10301 Democracy Lane, Suite 410 > > Fairfax, Virginia 22030 > > Phone : 703-293-9624 Fax : 703-293-9609 > > e-mail : [email protected] > > http://www.multicasttech.com > > > > Test your network for multicast : > > http://www.multicasttech.com/mt/ > > Status of Multicast on the Web : > > http://www.multicasttech.com/status/index.html > > >
|