North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: IP renumbering timeframe
On Thu, 30 May 2002 09:20:17 EDT, Leo Bicknell <[email protected]> said: > Since you have to connect to two or more providers to get an ASN, > and since the whole reason to have an ASN is to inject things into > the DFZ it doesn't seem like it would increase routing table size > by a huge amount. It would eliminate one whole paperwork/justification > step (for your first address allocation). For subsequent allocations > there is an example (that /24) of how efficiently the ISP uses the > space. Unless I'm missing something, it will double the size of it, since that /24 out of that /8 won't aggregate with their other address space. (Hint - our AS has 198.82/16 and 128.173/16 and some other small blocks - how many routes do YOU see for us?) Also, there's no real reason to think that address space usage in that bootstrap /24 will accurately reflect usage in a /20 allocated to them, since THAT /20 will probably be sub-allocated to users/customers. Heck, in our AS, the nameservers and mailservers and the like would probably fit into a /27 (maybe a /26), and wouldn't tell you anything about the /20 that covers Torgeson Hall.... -- Valdis Kletnieks Computer Systems Senior Engineer Virginia Tech Attachment:
pgp00058.pgp
|