|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: Arbor Networks DoS defense product
On Wed, 15 May 2002, PJ wrote: > On Wed, 15 May 2002, Dan Hollis wrote: > > We are not landmining for DOSing. > > We are landmining to make it very dangerous for attackers to scan networks > > and probe hosts. > Are you now operating under the premise that scans != anything but the > prelude to an attack? Sorry if I missed it earlier in the thread, but > I would hate to think any legitimate scanning of a network or host > would result in a false positive. Even more, I would hate to see the > advocation of a hostile reaction to what, so far, is not considered a > crime. It would take more than a single landmine hit to get blackholed. Like, duh. Enough hits on a wide sensor net prove bad intentions, as proven by dshield. I'm suprised at the extremely shallow level of arguments so far against landmines. Well, I guess I shouldnt be suprised -- this *IS* nanog, after all... :P -Dan -- [-] Omae no subete no kichi wa ore no mono da. [-]
|