|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: Effects of de-peering... (was RE: ratios)
JS> Date: Fri, 10 May 2002 09:48:25 -0400
JS> From: James Smith
JS> I think we all assume that our provider "guarantees" us some
JS> sort of "total reachability". Near as I can figure, they do
JS> not. Therefore, you buy a pipe into their network based on
JS> percieved and actual connectivity and hope that the situation
JS> remains static at best. Does ANY provider give a
JS> "reachability" guarantee?
<iirc memory="bad">
Wasn't there a small russian ISP that had no access to _1_ during
the mid- or late-90s?
And didn't some ugly peering battles between 701 and 3561 back
when 3561 was MCI cause some { severely hampered | loss of }
connectivity between the two?
</iirc>
Help me out... I wasn't following routing and such very closely
back then. But it seems that none of this is new, just another
iteration of the same...
--
Eddy
Brotsman & Dreger, Inc. - EverQuick Internet Division
Phone: +1 (316) 794-8922 Wichita/(Inter)national
Phone: +1 (785) 865-5885 Lawrence
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 11:23:58 +0000 (GMT)
From: A Trap <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: Please ignore this portion of my mail signature.
These last few lines are a trap for address-harvesting spambots.
Do NOT send mail to <[email protected]>, or you are likely to
be blocked.
|