|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: [off topic]Re: NANOG costs
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 04:52:58PM -0400, Douglas A. Dever wrote: > Previously, Jim Mercer ([email protected]) wrote: > > minor quibble. > > > > on http://www.nanog.org/mtg-0206/index.html, it says: > > "Richmond Hill, Ontario, CN" > > > > i suspect it was meant as "Richmond Hill, Ontario, CA". > > Nope, "Ontario, CA" would be Ontario, California to all > of us in the United States. (And KONT to all you > pilots.) :-) "Ontario, CA" would be Ontario, Canada. "Ontario, CA, US" would be Ontario, California. lest you forget, the ISO did designate "US" for your country, not that it seems to be used much. NANOG is North American ...., which includes a couple other countries than just them Untied States. -- [ Jim Mercer [email protected] +1 416 410-5633 ] [ I want to live forever, or die trying. ]
|