North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: Perspective on ARIN allocations to non-American entities
On Fri, 5 Apr 2002 22:56:46 -0500 (EST), Brian Wallingford wrote: >I've searched the IANA and ICANN sites, and have found no justification >for what appear to be ARIN allocations to foreign entities within >66.231. > >Two serious UCE/hacking attempt offenders are as follows: >66.231.64.0/20 GIGA-BLK-1 Last I checked, Columbia was part of South America. The 'A' in Arin means America, the two continents. >66.231.128.0/20 ECON-BLK-1 > >Both of which appear to be completely unapologetic for their users' >activities and refuse to take any action against repeat offenders >(10's of thousands of attempts per week here). Why have these blocks >apparently been allocated via ARIN? > >Am I missing something? I'm not sure what you think ARIN has to do with UCE/hacking. ARIN allocates IP addresses. The regional splitting of the registries is more for reasons of convenience than anything else and I don't believe there's any special reason ARIN should deny a request just because the addressees will be using the block out-of-the region. (Though it is recommended that you use the registry for your region.) It is common for companies with a presence in multiple regions to deal with a single regional registry and then use the blocks where they actually need them. This is much better than them using two for a variety of reasons including that it makes the registry better able to assess the justification. So a multinational company might request all the blocks it needs through ARIN and it's U.S. office. What benefit do you think a policy of strictly enforcing region boundaries would have? DS
|