|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: Help with bad announcement from UUnet
In a message written on Fri, Mar 29, 2002 at 08:11:14AM -0600, Andy Walden wrote:
> > What would work better/faster?
> >
> > my-noc -> b0rken-noc
> >
> > or
> >
> > my-noc -> my-upstream-noc -> b0rken-noc-upstream-noc -> b0rken-noc
>
> Work better for who? For you? Sure. For a any provider that needs to
> provide quality services to its customers and follow processes to do so,
> not a chance. The Big Picture is key here.
Note that in both cases, b0rken-noc takes a single call, so their
load is unchanged. The second case adds a call to both my-upstream-noc,
and b0rken-noc-upstream-noc.
It would seem going direct would put a lower load on NOC's in general,
which presumably would let them spend more time on problems and provide
better service.
--
Leo Bicknell - [email protected] - CCIE 3440
PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/
Read TMBG List - [email protected], www.tmbg.org
|