North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: PBNAPs renumbering 6-Mar-02 (was: more info on SBC/Nap)

  • From: bmanning
  • Date: Mon Mar 11 08:14:21 2002

i
I hope that the SBC folk will correct this soon. 


> 
> I assume the switch happened? In any case, there are no DNS servers listed for
> the in-addr records of these two blocks; is this by design?
> 
> Adi
> 
> On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 01:08:37PM -0500, renster wrote:
> > 
> > Thanks Bill!
> > 
> > Just one clarification - participants were told this would happen on 
> > 6-March.
> > 
> > From the note sent out to participants on Monday:
> > PBNAP-SF - 198.32.128.x will become: 206.223.120.x
> > PBNAP-LA - 198.32.129.x will become: 206.223.121.x
> > 
> > If you are a participant and didn't get a copy of the note with dial-in 
> > number for the maint. window drop me a line and I'll put you in touch with 
> > the folks at the NAP.
> > 
> > Cheers,
> > -ren
> > 
> > At 06:21 PM 2/14/2002 +0000, [email protected] wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > >I've just been told that SBC/PacBell is in process of renumbering
> > >the PacBell exchanges in Oakland and LA.  So you should not see
> > >either 198.32.128.0 or 198.32.129.0 in your traceroutes or from
> > >your peers as of 28 feb 2002.
> > >
> > >--bill
> > 
>