North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: PBNAPs renumbering 6-Mar-02 (was: more info on SBC/Nap)
i I hope that the SBC folk will correct this soon. > > I assume the switch happened? In any case, there are no DNS servers listed for > the in-addr records of these two blocks; is this by design? > > Adi > > On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 01:08:37PM -0500, renster wrote: > > > > Thanks Bill! > > > > Just one clarification - participants were told this would happen on > > 6-March. > > > > From the note sent out to participants on Monday: > > PBNAP-SF - 198.32.128.x will become: 206.223.120.x > > PBNAP-LA - 198.32.129.x will become: 206.223.121.x > > > > If you are a participant and didn't get a copy of the note with dial-in > > number for the maint. window drop me a line and I'll put you in touch with > > the folks at the NAP. > > > > Cheers, > > -ren > > > > At 06:21 PM 2/14/2002 +0000, [email protected] wrote: > > > > > > >I've just been told that SBC/PacBell is in process of renumbering > > >the PacBell exchanges in Oakland and LA. So you should not see > > >either 198.32.128.0 or 198.32.129.0 in your traceroutes or from > > >your peers as of 28 feb 2002. > > > > > >--bill > > >
|