North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: PBNAPs renumbering 6-Mar-02 (was: more info on SBC/Nap)
I assume the switch happened? In any case, there are no DNS servers listed for the in-addr records of these two blocks; is this by design? Adi On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 01:08:37PM -0500, renster wrote: > > Thanks Bill! > > Just one clarification - participants were told this would happen on > 6-March. > > From the note sent out to participants on Monday: > PBNAP-SF - 198.32.128.x will become: 206.223.120.x > PBNAP-LA - 198.32.129.x will become: 206.223.121.x > > If you are a participant and didn't get a copy of the note with dial-in > number for the maint. window drop me a line and I'll put you in touch with > the folks at the NAP. > > Cheers, > -ren > > At 06:21 PM 2/14/2002 +0000, [email protected] wrote: > > > >I've just been told that SBC/PacBell is in process of renumbering > >the PacBell exchanges in Oakland and LA. So you should not see > >either 198.32.128.0 or 198.32.129.0 in your traceroutes or from > >your peers as of 28 feb 2002. > > > >--bill >
|