|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: Problems with a black hole list in the netherlands
Actually, I did... I doesn't seem too on the level. With lines like: > Even we don't block, we just send a 471 > reply and let the monkeys determine whether the e-mail looks legitimate or spammy. However, after explaining all this about 127.0.0.2, there is a little note on the bottom: >What does 127.0.0.4 mean? > >Not much, it's the only code we return, >"not whitelisted" is perhaps the most accurate description. Guess the number returned for us ? Ironic, at least. Were it not referenced by http://Relays.OsiruSoft.com./, Frankly, I would care less. * Hint * Hint * Lionel wrote: > > On Sat, 09 Mar 2002 07:04:36 -0500, Richard Irving <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Hello, we are currently having a problem with a vigilante block list > >in the netherlands... I figure this is as good a forum as any.... > > > >>The boilerplate: > >>Please see <http://selwerd.cx/xbl/>, xbl is a *local* list, it would cost > >>us time to check whether we can whitelist your IP. > [...] > >How would one approach -this- ? > > I would start by reading the web page in the URL you quoted. You might > find it illuminating. > > -- > W > . | ,. w , "Some people are alive only because > \|/ \|/ it is illegal to kill them." Perna condita delenda est > ---^----^---------------------------------------------------------------
|