|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: Reducing Usenet Bandwidth
On Sun, Feb 17, 2002 at 01:44:53PM +0100, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote: > > On Fri, 8 Feb 2002, Stephen Stuart wrote: > > > The topic being discussed is to try to reduce USENET bandwidth. One > > way to do that is to pass pointers around instead of complete > > articles. If the USENET distribution system passed pointers to > > articles around instead of the actual articles themselves, sites could > > then "self-tune" their spools to the content that their readers (the > > "users") found interesting (fetch articles from a source that offered > > to actually spool them), either by pre-fetching or fetching on-demand, > > but still have access to the "total accumulated wisdom" of USENET - > > and maybe it wouldn't need to be reposted every week, because sites > > could also offer value to their "users" on the publishing side by > > offering to publish their content longer. > > I'm a bit behind on reading the NANOG list, so excuse the late reply. > > If we can really build such a beast, this would be extremely cool. The > method of choice for publishing free information on the Net is WWW these > days. But it doesn't work very well, since there is no direct relationship > between an URL and the published text or file. So people will use a "far > away" URL because they don't know the same file can be found much closer, > and URLs tend to break after a while. > > I've thought about this for quite a while, and even written down a good > deal of them. If you're interested: > > http://www.muada.com/projects/usenet.txt You might want to have a look at the freenet project, If you haven't. Some time ago there were ideas floating around about NNTP over Freenet. It gets quite close to what you are describing (modulo freedom;) http://freenetproject.org -- ____/| Ragnar H�jland Freedom - Linux - OpenGL | Brainbench MVP \ o.O| PGP94C4B2F0D27DE025BE2302C104B78C56 B72F0822 | for Unix Programming =(_)= "Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer for | (www.brainbench.com) U chaos and madness await thee at its end." [8 pend. Mar 10]
|