North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical RE: SlashDot: "Comcast Gunning for NAT Users"
Absolutely. If one goes to an all-you-can-eat buffet and has 4 plates of food, can the restaurant complain to them? Of course not, unless they have a definition of unlimited I don't know of. If you advertise unlimited access to a customer then they can use it as much as they want to, by definition. Greg -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Steven J. Sobol Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 1:59 PM To: Greg Pendergrass Cc: Rowland, Alan D; [email protected] Subject: RE: SlashDot: "Comcast Gunning for NAT Users" On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, Greg Pendergrass wrote: > It doesn't make sense that an ISP should complain that customers use 100% of > what they pay for. So you think that dialup users should be allowed to stay online 24/7 for $20/month on an account advertised as unlimited? -- JustThe.net LLC - Steve "Web Dude" Sobol, CTO ICQ: 56972932/WebDude216 website: http://JustThe.net email: [email protected] phone: 216.619.2NET postal: 5686 Davis Drive, Mentor On The Lake, OH 44060-2752 DalNet: ZX-2
|