North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

RE: SlashDot: "Comcast Gunning for NAT Users"

  • From: Greg Pendergrass
  • Date: Thu Jan 31 14:22:24 2002

Absolutely. If one goes to an all-you-can-eat buffet and has 4 plates of
food, can the restaurant complain to them? Of course not, unless they have a
definition of unlimited I don't know of. If you advertise unlimited access
to a customer then they can use it as much as they want to, by definition.


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of
Steven J. Sobol
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 1:59 PM
To: Greg Pendergrass
Cc: Rowland, Alan D; [email protected]
Subject: RE: SlashDot: "Comcast Gunning for NAT Users"

On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, Greg Pendergrass wrote:

> It doesn't make sense that an ISP should complain that customers use 100%
> what they pay for.

So you think that dialup users should be allowed to stay online 24/7 for
$20/month on an account advertised as unlimited?

-- LLC - Steve "Web Dude" Sobol, CTO      ICQ: 56972932/WebDude216
website:  email: [email protected]  phone: 216.619.2NET
postal: 5686 Davis Drive, Mentor On The Lake, OH 44060-2752  DalNet: ZX-2