North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical
Re: DNS DOS increasing?
In the referenced message, James Smith said: > > -----Original Message----- > From: E.B. Dreger [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 12:08 PM > To: James Smith > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: RE: DNS DOS increasing? > > BGP isn't that expensive. > ---- > > For some, it is a cost that can be mitigated by "workaround" technologies > that are cheaper. > > Of course, it could be argued that if you're not willing to make the > investment to do it the BGP way, you don't really need it bad enough. > > Enter the salesman who is heard to tell his prospects "...you don't have the > cost of BGP, you get the same effect as BGP, and you don't even have to tell > your ISP!". With the added benefit of not increasing the routing table size. The downfall is (potentially) increased address consumption (perhaps mitigated in that small entities doubling a /28 is still better than lying cheating and stealing for a "large" PI or PA block). > James H. Smith II NNCDS NNCSE > Systems Engineer > The Presidio Corporation > > By the way, I speak only for myself, which gets me in enough trouble...