North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: Automated DLR conflict detection
> On Sun, 23 Dec 2001, Peter Galbavy wrote: > > You misunderstand. Which operators will offer this (backed by some > > underwritten insurance) in an effort to be better than the competition ? > > Buying car insurance doesn't alter the chances of your car breaking > down on a long trip. Insurance doesn't alter the chances of something > bad happening. Driver training, seat belts, and spare tires are things > which can reduce risk. > > A warranty is not a substitute for due dilegence. > > How can you perform due dilegence on a carrier? With a car, you > can open the trunk and check the spare tire. What is the best way > to check a spare circuit? To me, the diverse route *is* the safety belt. If it does not work when it is supposed to, I (or my mourning relatives) will sue the car companies arse off - if the attribution for the failure rests with a design of manufacturing flaw. Safety / Seat belts are not decoration - and neither should a diverse route or protection circuit be. (Yes, my English can boldly go... but I am still waiting for the coffee to finish.) Peter
|