North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical
Re: "Cisco Release Of Goner Worm Raises Eyebrows" (Newsbytes)
"Steven J. Sobol" wrote: > On Fri, 14 Dec 2001, ben hubbard wrote: > > > > address the security considerations of executable content. > > > > Yes, but does nanog have the power to prohibit list users from using said mail > > agent? > > > > It does (should?) however, have the ability to drop/refuse attachments > > (possibly over a certain size) - like Mr. Li's 54Kb gift to the list. > > A digital signature won't be more than a couple K in size, will it? I'd hope not - but thus the reason to drop only attachments over a certain size - (3k? 5k?) - to allow digital sig's, but can everything else. Of course, if someone's digital signature is larger than 5Kb.... I wouldn't mind dropping it anyway ;) Or, possibly, just drop the "large" attachments, but allow the associated message?