North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

RE: 132.0.0.0/10 not in the databases

  • From: Borchers, Mark
  • Date: Tue Nov 27 11:25:34 2001

This is all that shows up at http://www.nic.mil/:

route:         132.0.0.0/10
descr:         DISA, DSAC
               P. O. Box 1605
               Columbus
               OH 43216-5002, USA
origin:        AS568
member-of:     RS-COMM_US_FED
mnt-by:        MAINT-AS568
changed:       [email protected] 19940819
source:        RADB


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Leo Bicknell [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 10:02 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: 132.0.0.0/10 not in the databases
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 132.0.0.0/10 is floating around:
> 
> route-views.oregon-ix.net>show ip bgp 132.0.0.0/10 
> BGP routing table entry for 132.0.0.0/10, version 12484641
> Paths: (43 available, best #41)
>   Advertised to non peer-group peers:
>     64.166.72.140 
>   4513 13646 5696 568, (aggregated by 568 198.26.128.1)
>     195.66.224.82 from 195.66.224.82 (209.10.12.222)
>       Origin IGP, metric 7602, localpref 100, valid, 
> external, atomic-aggregate
> 
> [snip, route-views has more than a page of entries for it]
> 
> However, it doesn't apprar to be registered:
> 
> % whois -h whois.arin.net 132.0.0.0
> No match for "132.0.0.0".
> 
> 568 regisitered to disa.mil, and a number of longer prefixes
> inside the /10 are registered to .mil addresses:
> 
> % whois -h whois.arin.net 132.15.0.0
> Kadena Air Base (NET-KADENA-NET)
>    Bldg 792, Kadena AB JA
>    APO, AP 96368-5149
>    US
> 
> The question is, do they legitimately own the whole /10?  If
> so, why isn't it marked in the databases?
> 
> -- 
>        Leo Bicknell - [email protected] - CCIE 3440
>         PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/
> Read TMBG List - [email protected], www.tmbg.org
>