North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical RE: win95 and IEAK6.0
> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > Joshua Coombs > Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 3:08 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: win95 and IEAK6.0 > > > While it may be sooner than some would like, I've no qualms with > Microsoft cutting off older versions of software. Just think how > much smoother and stabler Win95 could have been if MS bit the bullet and > dumped DOS/win 3.1 support? > > In any case, why do your customers HAVE to use the latest IEAK package > to connect to your service? Is it not possible to keep older versions > on hand for older systems? I believe in the Microsoft Liscense for the IEAK. That when a new version is released you MUST upgrade to it in a reasonable amount of time. I am not sure about the exact wording as it has been a while since I messed with the IEAK. -Patrick -- Patrick Muldoon, Network/Software Engineer INOC, LLC [email protected] I am still waiting for the advent of the computer science groupie. > > Joshua Coombs > > * [email protected] > - All opinions, statements and outright lies > - contained within are copyright 2001 by > - Joshua Coombs and shall not be reprinted > - or publicly displayed without ignoring this > - useless boilerplate. >
|