North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

RE: win95 and IEAK6.0

  • From: Patrick Muldoon
  • Date: Wed Nov 21 15:28:35 2001

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
> Joshua Coombs
> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 3:08 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: win95 and IEAK6.0
> While it may be sooner than some would like, I've no qualms with
> Microsoft cutting off older versions of software.  Just think how
> much smoother and stabler Win95 could have been if MS bit the bullet
> dumped DOS/win 3.1 support?
> In any case, why do your customers HAVE to use the latest IEAK package
> to connect to your service?  Is it not possible to keep older versions
> on hand for older systems?

I believe in the Microsoft Liscense for the IEAK.  That when a new
version is released you MUST upgrade to it in a reasonable amount of
time.  I am not sure about the exact wording as it has been a while
since I messed with the IEAK.


Patrick Muldoon, Network/Software Engineer
[email protected] 

I am still waiting for the advent of the computer science groupie.

> Joshua Coombs
> * [email protected]
> - All opinions, statements and outright lies
> - contained within are copyright 2001 by
> - Joshua Coombs and shall not be reprinted
> - or publicly displayed without ignoring this
> - useless boilerplate.