|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical RE: Cable & Wireless Maintencance
4006 did - I have no idea what the new owners (Cogent) intend, in that area. Hopefully they will stick with it. Implimenting a rich community set like this is a boon to customers, and generally a great learning experience for the engineers involved. It is also a great troubleshooting tool for NOCs and engineering departments. Kudos to C&W for this. Efforts such as this, show that the concept of "transit as a commodity" is really nonsensical. If anyone is actually interested in how to do impliment something like this, let me know. If there is enough interest, perhaps a tutorial on this could be done at the next NANOG. - Daniel Golding > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of > E.B. Dreger > Sent: Saturday, November 17, 2001 6:11 PM > To: [email protected] > Cc: James A. Farrar; nanog > Subject: Re: Cable & Wireless Maintencance > > > > > Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2001 12:00:23 -0500 (EST) > > From: [email protected] > > > This part: > > http://cw-rr.cw.net/community_prepend.htm > > > > is really cool. Do any other backbones support such selective > > prepending to peers? > > AFAIK, > > 701: "too complex to implement" (see NANOG archives) > 1239: claims to (soon will find out for certain) > 3561: good job! > 3356: unofficially > 3549: "plans to", but no definite date > 4006: yes (comments or URL, Daniel? how is post-Cogent? who is > the current NetRail/Cogent BGP guru?) > 6347: definite no, no plans to > > I know that I've asked the same question myself many times... > Phil in CW Europe mentioned that they were planning to do what > they have now launched, L3 contacted me off-list, UU is public, > GBLX and SVVS are based on my personal private communications, > and SPRN is secondhand info. > > I, too, would love a comprehensive checklist for the biggest two > or three dozen ASNs. Anyone else who can comment on other ASNs, > or add clarity to what I've posted? > > > Eddy > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > --------- > Brotsman & Dreger, Inc. - EverQuick Internet Division > Phone: +1 (316) 794-8922 Wichita/(Inter)national > Phone: +1 (785) 865-5885 Lawrence > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > --------- > > Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 11:23:58 +0000 (GMT) > From: A Trap <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Subject: Please ignore this portion of my mail signature. > > These last few lines are a trap for address-harvesting spambots. Do NOT > send mail to <[email protected]>, or you are likely to be blocked. >
|