North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

RE: Re: Postmaster 'best practices' query

  • From: Mike Batchelor
  • Date: Tue Oct 23 14:32:42 2001 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

> The Host Requirements RFC also says, I believe, that you are to
> respond to PING -- try that with www.microsoft.com.  My point is,
> it appears that the Host Requirements RFC seems to be "interpreted"
> in the real world.  Lots of sites seem to not implement postmaster.

My pet peeve is "501 bogus mail from" in response to "mail from:<>", as
required by RFC1123.  This just fills up my double-bounce mailbox with other
people's bounces, and deprives senders of notification of delivery failures.
So I stopped accepting mail from domains that refuse their own bounces.

Ipswitch Imail is usually the culprit, with the "refuse null sender"
mis-feature.

- ---
"The avalanche has already begun.  It is too late for the pebbles to vote" -
Kosh

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.8 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com>

iQA/AwUBO9W3C0ksS4VV8BvHEQIHVQCgpHU6wGJwLFK9z5mTB8mSxP22msEAn0yA
9ZDao1YnuzwHAMmiXg8w0J+A
=90em
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----