North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

RE: Communities

  • From: E.B. Dreger
  • Date: Tue Oct 16 11:49:56 2001

> Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2001 09:55:12 +0100
> From: Kevin Gannon <[email protected]>

> I've been thinking about other information that could be
> conveyed in communities. For instance, bandwidth, delay and
> packet loss. If each router along the way modifies such a
> community (should probably be an extended one) then a much
> richer set of information would be available to multihomers to
> aid in route selection.

[ snip ]

I'd toyed with the bandwidth idea... let's say that we create
0xffff:1, :2, :3, and :4 to mean sub-T1, T3, OC3, and >= OC12.
Arbitrary and simplified for sake of example.

Whenever a router forwards, it tags with the appropriate speed.
Thus, if :1 is set, you _know_ this path has a sub-T1 link.  Of
course, some places might use bogus tags to try hiding their
connectivity... but an upstream could use a route-map to let
the truth escape.

Thus, with proper administration by upstreams, !set{:1|:2|:3|:4}
would indicate no participants along the way.  However, if this
were to gain momentum among the biggest three dozen ASen, I think
that we'd have a very accurate system.  Even the top one dozen
could do a very good job, considering how many connect directly
to them...


Eddy

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Brotsman & Dreger, Inc. - EverQuick Internet Division
Phone: +1 (316) 794-8922 Wichita/(Inter)national
Phone: +1 (785) 865-5885 Lawrence
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 11:23:58 +0000 (GMT)
From: A Trap <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: Please ignore this portion of my mail signature.

These last few lines are a trap for address-harvesting spambots.  Do NOT
send mail to <[email protected]>, or you are likely to be blocked.