North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical RE: BGP noise tonight? (fwd)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 We have found our stick was effective with our vendor, given enough beatings. Regards, Matt - -- Matt Levine @Home: [email protected] @Work: [email protected] ICQ : 17080004 PGP : http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x6C0D04CF "The Trouble with doing anything right the first time is that nobody appreciates how difficult it was." - -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Randy Bush Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2001 11:47 AM To: Sean Donelan Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: BGP noise tonight? (fwd) > I agree, it is only one step on a long road. But you have to take > the first step, if nothing else, so when a "new" vendor releases a > product it won't include the old behavior. Or at least, an > officially revised RFC gives customers another stick to beat their > vendor. but we have the stick now. unfortunately, we also have a vendor who ignores sticks. so adding different or more sticks may not be the way to go. randy -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGPfreeware 7.0.3 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com> iQA/AwUBO8NHrcp0j1NsDQTPEQJLDwCfQBus6S0ZrGFM77NnpyzbxrmBuHQAoMnx Fu0t89wOWFNODHlgDo2vi4fA =Mqmb -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|