North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical
Re: The backbone that sucks least?
> We have servers colocated in 8 locations, 4 each with 2 of the big-name > colo providers, one of which made news today (no points for accurate > guesses). We are looking at adding new server locations in a carrier > neutral location like Equinix (who else is doing multiple carrier neutral > locations and has available space? paix, for one. > Of those, who sucks least? Does paying extra for UUNET actually get you > anything extra (better customer service, better billing/accounting service, > better trouble ticket tracking and reporting)? i've just got to say that uunet's monitoring and trouble ticketing is Great. i don't know whether their backbone is good or not, but their proactive monitoring and subsequent issue tracking is just Great, that's all, Great. whoever set it up should definitely buy themselves a cigar, or whatever.