North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical
National infrastructure asset
On Fri, 21 Sep 2001, Matt Zito wrote: > I don't know if all of the colos are reacting this way, but at AT&T's > datacenter @ 811 10th Avenue in Manhattan, the security there has gone into > crisis mode. The steel doors are down to the main entrance - everyone must > enter through a side door, where your bags are thoroughly searched and IDs > checked to the Nth degree. Some providers put out press releases, others haven't. But I believe colo providers which normally have a lot of security and those which normally don't, took extra care with their security last week. But it does bring up another issue. As far as I know, Exodus is the only colocation designated a "national infrastructure asset. http://www.thestreet.com/tech/internet/1090327.html I have no idea what that means in practical terms. But I did want to raise the question. As an industry, we aren't vertically integrated. Instead its an inter-linked set of dependencies. Its not like the old days when the government could just call up Ma Bell, and find out what is happening. Carriers are tenents in facilities operated by others. All the colo operators work very hard to maintain service, and have contigency plans for foreseeable disasters. But when the unforseen does happen, should we have pre-planed responses with federal authorities? Do we need to include ISPs and the Internet in existing civil defense plans? And finally, should additional facilities be designated as national infrastructure assets?