North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: Afghanistan [OT]

  • From: Ng Pheng Siong
  • Date: Wed Sep 19 12:15:08 2001

On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 03:48:53PM -0700, Vadim Antonov wrote:
> I'd say the better way of communicating would be the classical
> native-language radio translation in Radio Liberty/Radio Free Europe
> fashion, otherwise known as propaganda.  Worked well for the USSR.  

You mean _against_ the USSR?


> Radios are cheap and realtively available (and hard to control, too).  
> May be worthwhile to actually air-drop loads of small and easy to hide
> solar-powered units.  I'd expect a lot of people to listen to those in
> hiding even when threatened with execution for mere posession.
> 
> Given the air superiority of NATO, controlling use of those radios by the
> local propaganda units can be very easy - just drop radio-guided missiles
> on Taliban transmitters.

How do I configure my router to filter out warmongers?


-- 
Ng Pheng Siong <[email protected]> * http://www.post1.com/home/ngps