North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: Re[3]: Where NAT disenfranchises the end-user ...

  • From: Valdis.Kletnieks
  • Date: Mon Sep 10 16:31:14 2001 
On Mon, 10 Sep 2001 20:46:48 BST, Alex Bligh said:

> Oh so true, and of far wider applicability than the subject at
> hand. If this mailing list had a FAQ, this should be the answer
> to most of the questions.

Q1: What are the common flame wars on NANOG?
A1: RFC1918, ORBS/MAPS, ARIN, PI /28s, DSL for business use.

Q2: What are some proper ways to configure/run a network? For instance,
should I use RFC1910 space to number my routers?
A2: See Q1.
-- 
				Valdis Kletnieks
				Operating Systems Analyst
				Virginia Tech

Attachment: pgp00004.pgp
Description: PGP signature