North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical
Re: Re: Where NAT disenfranchises the end-user ...
On Mon, 10 Sep 2001 20:46:48 BST, Alex Bligh said: > Oh so true, and of far wider applicability than the subject at > hand. If this mailing list had a FAQ, this should be the answer > to most of the questions. Q1: What are the common flame wars on NANOG? A1: RFC1918, ORBS/MAPS, ARIN, PI /28s, DSL for business use. Q2: What are some proper ways to configure/run a network? For instance, should I use RFC1910 space to number my routers? A2: See Q1. -- Valdis Kletnieks Operating Systems Analyst Virginia Tech