North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical
Re: Where NAT disenfranchises the end-user ...
> > ...except current implementations of IPSEC: > > > > http://www.isp-planet.com/technology/2001/ipsec_nat.html > > > > Luckily, the above article also mentions the fixes that are in the > > works... On Thu, 6 Sep 2001, Bora Akyol wrote: > Bob > I am not supporting NAT here, but > most common IPSEC implementations including Free S/WAN work fine behind > NAT. > > Bora I stand corrected after perusing http://jixen.tripod.com/#NATed%20gateways - although I'm not sure I'd describe that as working "fine", but rather "can be made to work, in a narrow set of circumstances". It should be noted that the Free S/WAN docs explicitly recommend against trying it. -- Bob <[email protected]> | Yes. I know. That is, indeed, *not* mayonnaise.