|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: Where NAT disenfranchises the end-user ...
On Thu, 6 Sep 2001, Doug Clements wrote: > > A business that requires direct Internet access can't use NAT at the border. > > Not true. While I expect you will take this as nitpicking, one:one NAT is > very conveniently used for servers while one:many NAT can be used for > generic workstation access while preserving a consistent LAN numbering > scheme. Anything that a "full" internet connection gets you will also work > with one:one NAT. ...except current implementations of IPSEC: http://www.isp-planet.com/technology/2001/ipsec_nat.html Luckily, the above article also mentions the fixes that are in the works... -- Bob <[email protected]> | Yes. I know. That is, indeed, *not* mayonnaise.
|