|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical RE: multi-homing fixes
Sean M. Doran wrote: > Let me take some of your text out of context and agree with it fully: > > [A permanently stable holes-in-CIDR-blocks environment exists] > | Only if there is a limit on the number of ISPs. I don't think there > | is such a [practical rather than absolute] limit > > The problem with metro-based addressing is that the statement > above is equally true for it as for PA addressing. > Understanding the truth in that general statement, I would like to know if anyone sees a significant difference in the number of holes created by each approach. Handwaving can go either way, so the question is given real topologies and multi-homing goals, is there enough difference in the number of holes created to bias the approach? Responses should go to [email protected] Tony
|