|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: What is the limit? (was RE: multi-homing fixes)
> >Should there be a limit of 1 of these assignments made per 'entity', with > >renumbering occurring if further address space is required ? > > For clarification, the current proposal did not specify any limitation > on the number of such assignments. > > What would be the motivation for this? I would say, to keep the tables from growing. Either have them renumber into another 'larger' space or allow them to grow into a larger space. micro allocations are a good thing (tm) if they are done right. > >If so should we consider reserving the next larger block for a period of > >time, to account for possible growth ? > > No reservations will be made. It is generally assumed that applicants > will be paying a one-off service fee, rather than an ongoing > membership based fee. This is in fact identical to the way that PI > assignments can currently be obtained. The proposal restricts the > assignments to (about to be) multihomed orgs. ok, if this is the case, have them renumber to keep the number of announcements down. > >Should 'small multi-homing' assignments be made from a specific (defined) > >netblock ? > > I think there is a choice here. We can use "swamp" space, found mostly > in 202/8 which by definition does not contain large ranges of address > space, or we can take a range from the less "swampy" space ie. 218/8 > and use that. My feeling is that it would be better to use the 202/8 > range. right. but what ever space is used, publish it so those of us that have filters can adjust for it. :)
|