|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: Measuring PoP to PoP latency--tools to use?
That's what I'm looking for. Anyone know where source to something like this is available? Grant "Polinsky, Steven" wrote: > > Check this one, which also has links to similar services: > > http://weather.nts.uci.edu/weather/ > > Steven > > Steven M. Polinsky > Goldman, Sachs & Co. > 180 Maiden Lane > New York, NY 10038 > 212-902-3669 | Fax: 212-493-0107 > > -----Original Message----- > From: E.B. Dreger [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 10:40 PM > To: Grant A. Kirkwood > Cc: Sean Donelan; [email protected] > Subject: Re: Measuring PoP to PoP latency--tools to use? > > > There used to be a site somewhere (I think Andover or Keynote sucked up > > the domain, but it was a while ago) that had a very nice little script > > that pinged IP addresses and presented the visitor with average latency > > to those addresses. Looked something like this: > > > > UUNet (x.x.x.x) -> 38 ms (green) > > C&W (x.x.x.x) -> 68 ms (yellow) > > AOL (x.x.x.x) -> 400 ms (red) > > ratings.miq.net > www.internetweather.com ? > > Actually, the latter seems to have been borged by (was always a part > of?) the former. > > It may have also been netcopter.com, which is now dead... > > Eddy > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Brotsman & Dreger, Inc. - EverQuick Internet Division > Phone: +1 (316) 794-8922 Wichita/(Inter)national > Phone: +1 (785) 865-5885 Lawrence > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 11:23:58 +0000 (GMT) > From: A Trap <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Subject: Please ignore this portion of my mail signature. > > These last few lines are a trap for address-harvesting spambots. Do NOT > send mail to <[email protected]>, or you are likely to be blocked.
|