North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical RE: Routescience?
On Wed, 22 Aug 2001, Kavi, Prabhu wrote: > I would like to hear it too. However, in fairness to Routescience, > did anyone on NANOG previously ask Cisco and Juniper to publicly > talk about everything they (sometimes painfully) learned about > how to create resilient IS-IS/OSPF/BGP implementations? And even > if anyone would ask, are Cisco and Juniper likely to respond > (thereby giving a heads up to their competitors)? To the credit of Cisco and (later) Juniper IP routing folks, they always were in a very close touch with ISP backbone engineers. Cisco in particular publishes quite a lot of technical information. Which explais why their (and not their competitors) boxes are used to run the Internet. > Routescience may or may not have something worthwhile. However, > I would respect their perogative to not say much more on the > NANOG mailing list. Of course. --vadim
|