|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: wanted: wireless magic tricks
ps: it's not a U-Haul delay, but certainly 400ms + ;) Persio Pucci Analista Internetworking - Sao Paulo Impsat Comunicacoes Ltda. Tel: (55-11) 3444-6205 Fax: (55-11) 3444-6351 email: [email protected] ----- Original Message ----- From: "BRA-SAO-Pucci,Persio" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 1:21 PM Subject: Re: wanted: wireless magic tricks > Sattelite would do it. We had a 45Mb on a HSSI interface here and uesd to > work great, using a 9m diameter antenna. Now, the only thing would be the > cost for that... > > Persio Pucci > Analista Internetworking - Sao Paulo > > Impsat Comunicacoes Ltda. > Tel: (55-11) 3444-6205 > Fax: (55-11) 3444-6351 > email: [email protected] > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Young, Jason" <[email protected]> > To: "'Cerqua, Toby'" <[email protected]>; <[email protected]> > Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 1:13 PM > Subject: RE: wanted: wireless magic tricks > > > > > > > > cheap/fast/good. Pick two. > > > > I don't know that you can get that kind of speed from satellite. If you > could > > get that kind of range from point-to-point wireless at that speed, you'd > > certainly need a good line of sight. Do you have that? > > > > You should see if this data is reasonably compressible. Maybe your > bandwidth > > needs aren't as bad as you think. > > > > Jason Young > > CNS - Network Design, Anheuser-Busch > > (314)577-4597 > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Cerqua, Toby [mailto:[email protected]] > > > Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 11:02 AM > > > To: '[email protected]' > > > Subject: wanted: wireless magic tricks > > > > > > > > > > > > hey all, > > > > > > we've got a client that wants some crazy stuff, and i need either > > > suggestions or confirmation that this is impossible/too expensive. > > > > > > client needs 45Mbps pushed over 20 miles... and he wants it > > > wireless. the > > > kicker is that they don't want a T3 because it is "too > > > expensive" and it > > > would take too long to get installed. it doesn't need to be > > > constant, but he > > > wants to move of 2.5GB within 45 minutes. this is in the > > > chicago area, if > > > that helps any. so, i don't know, satellite? > > > > > > - toby > > > ----------------------------------------------- > > > [email protected] > > > http://www.platinumsystems.net > > > > > >
|