North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: product liability (was 'we should all be uncomfortable withthe extent to which luck..')
Since software, in theory, can't cause physical danger, I suspect the shrink wrap license makes Microsoft immune to any liability. If they advertise false claims then they could punishable under some states consumer protection laws. Look for the disclaimers. Now if you claim that you are forced to agree to the shrink wrap licence because of they are a monopoly and you are forced to use the product ... an iffy argument ... then you may have a something. BTW - It looks like Windows 2000 is subject to the BSD telnetd exploit. At 14:05 -0700 25-07-2001, Adam McKenna wrote: On Wed, Jul 25, 2001 at 01:59:38PM -0700, Dan Hollis wrote:So what point *does* microsoft become negligently liable? Never? Ask your attorney friend if he can think of *ANY* situation where m$ could be found negligent. Microsoft is giving a *great* sales pitch about reliability, stability, security, etc. but simply not delivering what they are advertising. This game of deceit is costing consumers billions.M$'s click/shrinkwrap licenses, as far as I can remember, discliam liability for any and all security problems. (And a lot of other stuff too.) --Adam -- Adam McKenna <[email protected]> | Help stop animal abuse at Petco! http://flounder.net/publickey.html | http://www.mickaboofriends.org GPG: 17A4 11F7 5E7E C2E7 08AA | 38B0 05D0 8BF7 2C6D 110A | -- Joseph T. Klein +1 414 915 7489 Senior Network Engineer [email protected] Adelphia Business Solutions [email protected] "... the true value of the Internet is its connectedness ..." -- John W. Stewart III
|